Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / 2 years on, Ukraine’s sinking of the Moskva intrigues China’s naval strategists
China, Russia, Ukraine

April 15, 2024

2 years on, Ukraine’s sinking of the Moskva intrigues China’s naval strategists

By Lyle Goldstein

The sinking of the Moskva two years ago seems to have made a major impression on Chinese naval strategists.

It’s paradoxical that the maritime theater of conflict has turned out to be one of the few bright spots for Kyiv in the conflict following from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, since Ukraine has no navy to speak of. Nevertheless, it has made the Kremlin pay a steep price for aggression and has now sunk or disabled an impressive one-third of all the warships of Russia’s vaunted Black Sea Fleet. This warship “massacre” began in earnest two years ago, when on April 14, 2022, Ukraine succeeded in sinking the missile cruiser Moskva, flagship of the Black Sea Fleet, striking an enormous psychological blow against the Russian invasion.

As we’ve noted in this series of articles, Chinese military strategists have been watching the Ukraine War closely, and events in the Black Sea, with special attention. Why would China be interested in uncovering the secrets of Ukraine’s success against a much larger fleet? Certainly, they are concerned that their own navy, which has grown impressively over the past decade, could also be vulnerable to similar asymmetric tactics.

For that reason, it is quite interesting to examine a very detailed and exceptionally candid appraisal of the sinking of the Moskva that appeared in one of China’s leading naval strategy magazines, Shipborne Weapons (舰载武器), published by an institute affiliated with the major shipbuilding conglomerate, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation. The article implies that the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and Chinese shipbuilders are seeking to learn lessons from Ukraine’s successful campaign against the Black Sea Fleet.

Read at The Diplomat

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Trump Steps Back From the Brink on Taiwan

By Lyle Goldstein

June 2, 2026

Q&AIran, Asia, China, China‑Taiwan, Great power competition

Takeaways from Trump’s China Trip

By Lyle Goldstein

May 26, 2026

Op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Can the Pentagon beat China if it struggles with Iran?

By Lyle Goldstein

May 25, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

How Trump and Xi Traded a New Cold War for a Cold Peace

By Lyle Goldstein

May 19, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Trump’s Taiwan ‘negotiating chip’ remark sparks alarm over how far he’d shift U.S.-China policy

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

May 18, 2026

In the mediaCuba, China, Western Hemisphere

Cuban drone crisis: U.S. fears Russia-China Caribbean threat

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 17, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.